Traditionally, manufacturing industry has
been very much producer lead. Even the
supporting techniques ± work study, stock
control, and so on ± were designed to reduce
costs and help the manufacturer. The range of
products available in the marketplace was
such that such an approach worked ± the
customer had to wait to get what he/she was
offered.
The ``quality revolution of the last ten
years arose because the marketplace has
become increasingly global. The big players
cut across national and even international
boundaries in ways which has opened up
customer choice. The growth of service
industries where the customer often plays a
direct role in the service delivery process has
lead to an increasingly sophisticated and
aware customer base. Manufacturing can no
longer assume that it can put products out to
customers to its own schedule and quality
levels.
Of course, most manufacturing industries
have realised this ± at least those parts of the
industry that have survived. They have spent
the last ten years searching for change ±
change that will allow them to identify, and
respond to, customer desires, and that will
allow them to get their products to market
quickly.
This responsiveness has become known as
``agile manufacturing ± the organisation has
the agility to respond quickly to particular,
and changing, customer needs. One of the
contributing factors to the ability to become
an agile manufacturer has been the development
of manufacturing support technology
that allows the marketeers, the designers and
the production personnel to share a common
database of parts and products, to share data
on production capacities and problems ±
particularly where small initial problems may
have larger ``downstream effects.
Goldman et al. (1995) suggest that ``Agility
has four underlying components:
(1) delivering value to the customer;
(2) being ready for change;
(3) valuing human knowledge and skills;
(4) forming virtual partnerships.
Most of these (in fact the first three) are also
the attributes of ``lean manufacturing.