User talk:Deelkar

jabberings

finally linked the Nature One with the german one, no longer a stub :) --Deelkar 07:05, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

actually it's longer now than the german version. *sigh* now I have to edit that one, too :) --Deelkar 09:48, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Comments from other users

OK, I removed Radiography. Thanks. Spoon! 19:00, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Moved to: --Deelkar 04:08, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Germanic America

Oops! Sorry! --Jpgordon 18:10, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No Problem :) --Deelkar (talk) 10:21, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Winged Nazgûl

It's a good point to mention, but 1-they are called Winged Nazgûl in the books, and 2-there is never going to be enough information about them to merit a separate article. I just redirected the new article, which accomplishes the task by directing someone who looks for Winged Nazgûl to the place where they can get more information on the subject. -[[User:Aranel|Aranel ("Sarah")]] 22:20, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Basepairing Figure

Hi Deelkar. As detailed at Talk:Nucleobase, there are several errors in Image:DNAbasePairing.png Josh Cherry 14:30, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

So how do we go about getting it fixed? I don't know whom to contact. Josh Cherry 17:39, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Merged this part of the talk with the my comments on User_talk:Josh Cherry I watch that page, so do reply there or discuss on Talk:Nucleobase. --Deelkar (talk) 08:57, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)