William Thompson (b. 1775 Cork City, d. - March 28, 1833
Rosscarbery, Co. Cork) was an Irish political
and philosophical writer and social reformer, developing from
utilitarianism into an early critic of capitalist exploitation
whose ideas influenced the Cooperative, Trade Union and
Chartist movements as well as Karl Marx. Born into
the Anglo-Irish Ascendancy of wealthy landowners and merchants of
Cork society, his attempt to will his estate the the cooperative
movement after his death sparked the longest court case in Irish legal
history as other branches of his family fought to have the will
annulled.
Life
Born in Cork the son and heir of one of the most prosperous merchants
of that city, Alderman John Thompson, who held, amongst other offices,
that of Lord Mayor in 1794. William inherited the small trading fleet
and landed estate near Glandore, West Cork after his father's death in
1814. Rejecting the role of absentee landlord commonly led by those of
a similar situation, William based his living quarters on the estate
and despite many travels, invested much time with the tenants on the
estate introducing agricultural innovations, services and education
for children aimed at improving the welfare and prosperity of the
families present.
Victim of weak health from an early age, Thompson became a non-smoker,
teetotaller and vegetarian for the last 13 years of his life. These
abstemious habits, he explained helped him in concentrating on his
reading and writing. Nonetheless, by the 1830s he was suffering from a
chest affliction that finally killed him on 28 March 1833. He had
never married and left no direct heir.
Ideas
An enthusiastic student of the writers and ideas of the
Enlightenment, Thompson became a convinced egalitarian and
democrat. His support for the French Revolution earned him the
label of "Red Republican" from Cork society and his support for
advocates of Catholic emancipation in elections further alienated him
from the rest of his wealthy protestant kith and kin.
Thompson was greatly impressed by the utilitarianism of
Jeremy Bentham with whom he corresponded and established a friendship,
later staying at the english philosopher's house for several months in
1821-22 while visiting London. As well as Bentham, Thompson read and
corresponded with other utilitarian contemporaries such as
David Ricardo and was influenced by William Godwin and
Thomas Malthus.
It was the contrasting ideas of Godwin and Malthus that spurred
Thompson into the project of research into the role of distribution in
political economy that led him to London and, in 1824, the
publication of "An Inquiry into the Principles of the Distribution of
Wealth..." (see biblio. for full title). As well as Malthus's disciple
David Ricardo, Thompson had also become acquainted with the work
of the French utopian socialists including Charles Fourier,
Henri Saint-Simon
and the economist Sismondi.
In the Inquiry Thompson follows the line of the
labour theory of value put forward by Ricardo in his "Principles of Political
Economy" published 7 years previously. However he characterises the
appropriation of the lions share of surplus value by the capitalist
owner of the tools of production as exploitation. He rejects the
Malthus/Ricardo proposition that any increase in the wage of the
workers can only result in their further immiseration, noting the
self-serving nature of this theory for capitalists pressing for
legislation to outlaw workers efforts to raise their wages. By
applying the utilitarian principle of "the greatest good for the
greatest number" to the existing and possible alternative schemes of
distribution, Thompson comes down on the side of an egalitarian
distribution of the product.
One of Thompson's colleagues in the Cooperative movement, John Minter
Morgan, made the observation that he was the first to coin the term
competitive to describe the existing economic system. The case for
the originality of this work is further made by Max Nettlau who
states: "[Thompson's] book, however, discloses his own
evolution; having started with a demand for the full product of labour
as well as the regulation of distribution, he ended up with his own
conversion to communism, that is, unlimited distribution."
In 1827 fellow "Ricardian socialist" Thomas Hodgskin published
"Labour Defended" which also characterised the appropriation of the
lions share of the fruits of production by landlord and capitalist as
explotation defrauding the worker of the full product of their
labour. However, Hodgskin proposed that the road to economic justice
for the labourer was through a reformed competitive system. Thompson
replied with "Labour Rewarded" defending cooperative communism against
Hodgskin's unequal wages.
Feminism
Although he rejected the political and economic implications of
Malthus' essay on population, Thompson recognised that, particularly
in Ireland, unrestrained population growth did pose the threat of
rising poverty. As such he was like Bentham and Francis Place an
advocate of the benefits of contraception. Thompson's development
of a critique of the contemporary status of women was most strongly
influenced by his long-term close friendship with
Anna Doyle Wheeler . He had met Wheeler while staying with Bentham and they
moved in those utilitarian circles that included James Mill. It
was the publcation of the latter's "On Government" which called for
the vote for men only, that aroused the fervent opposition of both
Wheeler and Thompson and to the rebuttal in "Appeal of One Half of the
Human Race..." (see biblio. for full title).
Influence on Cooperative Movement
Thompson and others of the Cooperative movement have
tended to be somewhat unfairly subsumed under the political label of
Owenism. In fact, although his writings and social
experiments at New Lanark had helped to bring the cooperative
movement together, many, Thompson included, were critical of Owen's
authoritarian and anti-democratic tendencies. Thompson further
distrusted Owen's courtship of rich and powerful patrons, believing
that the rich as a class could be never be expected to be in favour of
any project of emancipation for the labouring poor as this would
threaten their privilege. He also believed in the necessity of the
workers in any co-operative community having eventual security of
ownership of the community's land and capital property.
These differences led to open confrontation between Thompson and Owen
at the Third Cooperative Congress held in 1832 in London. Owen,
perhaps discouraged by the failure of his attempted community at
New Harmony, maintained that it was necessary to wait for Government and
Stock Exchange support and investment into large scale
communities. Thompson and his supporters contended that they must move
towards establishing independant small scale communities based on the
movement's own resources. The argument was not resolved at that
congress and by the following one Thompson was unable to attend
probably as a result of the illness that was to lead to his death in
another five months.
Marx had come across Thompson's work on a visit to Manchester in 1845
and cites it in passing in "The Poverty of Philosophy" (1847) and also
in "Capital" itself. However the same can be said of other of the proto-socialist
political economists such as Thomas Hodgskin, John Grey, John Francis Bray. It
seems suprising then, that the likes of Beatrice and Sidney Webb would
characterise Marx as "the illustrious disciple" of Thompson and Hodskin. Sentiments also echoed by the likes of Harold Laski and other british historians of socialism. In this they were accepting the earlier thesis in Anton Menger 's "Right to the Whole Produce of Labour" (1899) that amalgamated all the aforementioned into a homogenous category of Ricardian socialists which obscured the important differences between Thompson's communist critique of Hodgskin's "market libertarian" position. A critique later echoed in Marx's critique of Ferdinand Lassalle's Gotha Programme.
Bibliography
Thompson, William, An Inquiry into the Principles of the
Distribution of Wealth Most Conducive to Human Happiness; applied to
the Newly Proposed System of Voluntary Equality of Wealth, (Longman,
Hurst Rees, Orme, Brown & Green: London), 1824.
Thompson, William, Appeal of One Half the Human Race, Women, Against
the Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, to Retain Them in Political,
and thence in Civil and Domestic Slavery, (Longman, Hurst Rees,
Orme, Brown & Green: London), 1825.
Thompson, William, Labor Rewarded. The Claims of Labor and Capital
Conciliated: or, How to Secure to Labor the Whole Products of Its
Exertions, (Hunt and Clarke: London), 1827.
Thompson, William, Practical Directions for the Speedy and
Economical Establishment of Communities on the Principles of Mutual
Co-operation, United Possessions and Equality of Exertions and the
Means of Enjoyments, (Strange and E. Wilson: London), 1830.
Connolly, James, 'The first Irish socialist: A forerunner of Marx' in
Labour in Irish History, (Dublin, 1910; London, 1987)
Pankhurst, Richard, William Thompson (1775 - 1883) Pioneer
Socialist, (Pluto Press, London), 1991.
Dooley, Dolores, Equality in Community: Sexual Equality in the
Writings of William Thompson and Anna Doyle Wheeler, (Cork
University Press, Cork), 1996.
Dooley, Dolores (Ed.), William Thompson: Appeal of One Half of the
Human Race, (Cork University Press, Cork), 1997.
External Links
PGIL-EIRData entry for William Thompson
Cork's Praxis group on William Thompson
Sunshine for Women on William Thompson