If you are here because you have found a page that needs attention, please:
Check the resources for collaboration box on the right to make sure there is not a more appropriate page.
Consider adding a tag to the article instead of listing it here. See Wikipedia:Cleanup resources. This may reduce work in the long term.
If you want to do a traditional listing instead of tagging, please do so under the appropriate date heading below.
Some editors prefer that helpers work on leftovers and older articles first, just to deal with them and get them out of the way.
But either preference, new or old, all help is appreciated. If you have a cleanup routine, add your name and your routine preferences (how often, old/new articles, what subjects, etc ) to the cleanup routine list .
Infinity - writing is chatty and rambling. It seems, for example, that one long sentence starts out talking about Buzz Lightyear and ends up talking about transfinite cardinals. Most of the article is that unfocused. There has been some dispute over what the page should contain before, so good luck. RSpeer
Derek Trucks - Significant blues musician, but terrible/non-wiki article. Rogerd 17:33, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
April 20, 2005
Nazareth Speedway - Fact information does not seem right. Belmont Stakes
Alexander Exquemelin - I just moved it from Exquemelin, as "Alexander" seems to be the first name he is most commonly referred to by. As it is, it is more of an exposition on Exquemelin's book rather than him as a person. DO'Иeil 08:09, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
Twix - very sloppy, why does there need to be an ingredient listing? Mcfly85
Carpenters: besides needing copy-ed, IMO there is enuf material for three short, coherant articles within this confusingly organized one: one abt the duo, and two bios. Note in any case that the bio secn is no bio but the childhood portion for one, and the organization by decades is offensive to the concept of recognizing the trends in order to tell a person's or group's chronology in terms of its natural units. Are we supposed to believe that this group, e.g., listened to Al Franken, and took it to heart that they would have to become something different from what they had been in the Me Decade , to succeed in the Al Franken Decade ? --Jerzy (t)
Sorry, Wrong Ed. The creator keeps removing the cleanup tag, but I just can't make any sense out of the article. I can't even work out what on earth the thing its describing actually is, other than some kind of comedy sketch. I also can't see how its related to Lemony Snicket who is referenced in the article. David Johnson [T|C] 22:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Michael w. dean - seems like a notable enough author, but page needs wikifying, general organization cleanup, copyediting, etc. -- Dcfleck 01:54, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)
April 19, 2005
David Mertz - appears to be vanity for a (somewhat?) notable individual. -- Grunt [[European Union|]] 02:59, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
Boob tube - currently a dictionary definition that thinks it's a disambiguation page.
A disambiguation page is supposed to link to other, more specific pages, not just act as a dictionary definition. As such, it is silly to have Tube top just linking to here. Moreover, Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
Three possible solutions:
If someone's in a position to create an adequate Tube top article, by all means do it, and then put back the link to it back on Boob tube.
Delete Tube top - then the link can be put back and Boob tube will be that little bit more like a dab page again
I tried my hand at improving this. I moved the redirect of Tube top to Shirt as there seems to be no disagreement about what a tube top is. It still may need, however, to be transfered to Wiktionary. -65.66.103.43 14:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) (I'm sorry that my computer seems to be logging me out).
John Landy - poor, unattractive article on an important Australian figure
Seems to be cleaned up now. Mgm|(talk) 10:24, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
April 16, 2005
Mario Lanza - Wow. I don't know where to start. The massive unwikified lump notice seems appropriate here. There's bound to be some copyvio here too. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 08:23, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
SOAP - excessive technical detail; little general explanation. David 11:54, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
I replaced the cleanup template with a Template:technical plate, which is more specific. Phils 16:23, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Some of us want to put in the information/wikify rather than deal untangling such problems. Quite a few of the French Cantons/Communes etc link up to disambiguation pages: could they be made easier to split up when information is provided? (And the French prefect lists in French could be translated - and set out consistently in both languages - does not need a knowledge of the language.)
Just pointing out a few other things that could be done - the French lists are inconsistently laid out etc.
Chacón. A mess. Unwikified, unformatted. May even be two separate articles (it seems to be on two different subjects) - it's difficult to tell. Grutness|hello? 03:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's more than a mess, it's a copyright violation. See [1]Revived 19:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Order of the Red Banner Massive rewrite, re-arrange photo graphs and need to find more information about the medals. Zscout370 11:06, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Night of the Aurochs Current article is a laudatory review. Needs NPOV-ing, more details. Ellsworth 14:04, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Marine Iguana Simply abominable. Not worthy of Wikipedia.
France seems to have been vandalised (by someone with less intelligence than the onions mentioned).
Silver ratio - missing (presumably) mathematical expressions: "The sequence [...], of power fractional parts, where [...] is the fractional part, is equidistributed for almost all real numbers x > 1, with the silver ratio being one exception." -- Smjg 17:22, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Camera diet- poor language, needs to talk about the concept by using the concept itself, not an example. -Frazzydee|✍ 22:25, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Word salad - First paragraph and rest of the article have absolutly nothing to do with eachother. --216.159.156.214 07:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I split the article in two. *Kat* 07:37, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Habsburg - seems to be having an identity crisis. Not sure if it is a list, an article or a coalition of formats. *Kat* 06:41, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Suggested splitting into two articles on talk page. Crazynas 05:27, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Leesa and Laura Andrew - I suspect that this whole page is a hoax, but am far from sure. Could someone take a look and see if they think if deserves to be listed on VfD? Lupin 06:10, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Google verifies that they exist, but I'm not sure they are encyclopedic. *Kat* 07:28, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
It is borderline, but I would tend to keep it. Zzyzx11 | Talk 23:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
They may exist, but can anyone verify any of the facts in the article? Lupin 23:33, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Karl Zell - unwikified copy-and-paste from the Catholic Encyclopedia --Tothebarricades.tk 03:30, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wikified, categorized, modified some of the blatant pov to a more npov, removed a couple of statements to the discussion page. Still needs work by somebody more familiar with the subject.*Kat* 07:23, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Pancho Villa - "Nevertheless, Carranza delayed to Villa by the proximity of other heads, specially the sonorenses, reason why Villa began to also separate of the Maximum Head of the Revolution. In 1914, Carranza mentioned a convention of the revolutionary forces, to file harshness among them, without obtaining its objective, because Villa seized of the convention, in Aguascalientes, and broke relations with Carranza, nominating a new president of the Republic, Villa took, with the General Emiliano Zapata, the city of Mexico, having Carranza that to flee towards the port of Veracruz. But then the sonorense Alvaro Obregón, constitutionalist commander of the forces of Carranza, calls, began to beat to those of Villa, convencionistas calls, until managing to annihilate them, in the famous battle of Celaya, where Obregón lost an arm. Villa looked for the recognition of the United States, for his government, and as he did not obtain it, he visited the border population of Columbus, where he take weapons" etc etc. Is this just a poor translation or is the result of setting a computerised translator loose (presumably on a Spanish version)? Either way, it seems to need help, and I am afraid my Mexican history really isn't up to much, so I really don't understand enough of the context to fix it. Could anybody assist? There doesn't seem to be any of the original language left so I didn't list it on pages needing translation. VivaEmilyDavies 01:40, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
wikified, stubbed and catagorized, still needs some copyediting changed template from cleaup to copyedit Crazynas 05:44, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
List of World War II aces by country Lots of names in no apparent order The names should be sorted alphabetically by surename (Except for China and Japan). Fornadan 21:14, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I cleaned the article up a lot. Someone might still want to work on it. By the way, Golden Torizo redirects to Torizo. --Redattack34 19:44, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
Randall Terry — I added a paragraph on NOW v. Scheidler, a 1994 Supreme Court case in which he was named co-defendant; the case pertained to the application of RICO, under which Terry settled out of court in 1998. However, it still needs work, especially with regards to POV. It is currently in chronological order, but the order is not entirely logical.
Presbyterian Youth Connection needs wikification, cleanup, and organization. I'm not sure this article is notable enough for Wikipedia. If anyone wants to they could check that out. --Redattack34 02:19, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
I reworked/reformatted into sections, wikified, still needs some factual help tho. Crazynas
Samer Issa - Needs wikification and cleanup. Might not be notable enough. --Redattack34 20:02, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
I reworked and reformatted this entry. I know absolutely nothing about him, so this is as good as I can do. The original author of this entry created several other pages that badly need cleanup, I'll go do those next. - Rjhatl 23:09, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
April 8 2005
New Historicism has two unintegrated sections, one wikified and the other not, with an external link between them. -Acjelen
Sholtar Did the work wikifying and cleaning up this article, I went ahead and removed the notice. Crazynas 10:38, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
April 7 2005
Talk:Papal election needs updating for clarity - ie references to "the present pope" etc.
Hasni - an article might be justifiable, but this is PoV, not wikified, poorly structured, the title should be Cheb Hasni - his full name, and what have you.
I edited it a bit, it still needs a lot of work though. Like a discography...RadioYeti
Further cleanup done, and I've now removed the tag --Martpol
In the page on Lead please rewrite this sentence: The origin of the name of the fruit called a plum is not related. (i.e. not related to Latin word plumbum meaning lead).
That was crazy! It was way harder than it looked. I came up with, "The word "plum" (the fruit) is of a different origin altogether and is unrelated."
I found out where plum actually came from. It's an Old English word. Mr. Internet 17:48, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
Fjortis undoubtedly refers to a real phenomenon and is IMHO worth its own entry, but at the moment, it's in dire need of NPOVing. Phrases such as "Sweden's biggest (and most hated) community" don't seem very encyclopedic, either. It'd be great if someone who's familiar with the Swedish version of the underage girls drinking themselves silly should take a look at this. Captain Disdain 01:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Belstone - apparently some town or village in England. Looks like an article/book summary (but Google brought up no copyvio). Needs abridging, wikifying, context. - Marcika
I've removed the tag following some fairly extensive cleanup. But I wouldn't like to remove any more material than has gone already. - Martpol
St. Cloud State University - seriously POV praise for the university in a non-encyclopedic writing style. - Marcika 02:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wow. That was awful. I did a quick rewrite of the page to remove the POV stuff and the vandalism that occured afterward. Rjhatl 02:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Little green men - I've been going through the synonyms for extraterrestrial life and found this page. It appears to be about the discovery of pulsars, but has the title "Little Green Men". No clear explaination for this title is given. It probably needs to be merged with the pulsars article. -Acjelen
Intro/references added and Pulsar information moved into a sub-section. More is probably needed though. — RJH 17:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
April 5 2005
David Bawden: I suspect i'd ask for PoV clnup if i could understand what it's saying ('Calling him an "anti-pope" would undoubtedly be inaccurate as to all appearances the following he has, compared to Pope John Paul II, is minuscule, making him comparable to other similar pretenders to the Papal name, like ...').--Jerzy (t)
First French Empire is heavily laden with 1911 Britannica POV, and maybe some factual errors as well. There's been some discussion on the talk page. We all seem to agree it's a problem, but no one involved has considered themselves expert enough to really take it on. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:27, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
Cleaned up some, this still needs quite a bit of information Crazynas 20:41, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Juan de Zumárraga - An entire Catholic Encyclopedia entry has simply been copied and pasted into the article, without any Wikification at all. DO'Иeil 07:23, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
wikified, still needs some work tho Crazynas 21:21, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Panarchy - Right now, this article is little more than a collection of quotes by various panarchist writers. I don't know enough about the subject to clean it up myself. -- Mihnea Tudoreanu 21:49, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Orders of Council - needs much work. It's a stub dealing with one highly specific historical use of this much more general and widely-used term. Grutness|hello? 12:12, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Rindwater - April 1?
No hits on Google or Clusty. Submitted for VFD as hoax. Mgm|(talk) 21:47, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Upstream transcription factor needs a lot of work, though I'm not sure what kind. It needs an introduction and an explanation as to what exactly it is. So far it's a bunch of letters that look like a code of some kind. --Redattack34
March 30 2005
Kanenobu strange image led me here, needs format help at least - cohesion☎ 05:43, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
An Issues section was recently added to Slingers, and is painfully incoherant and hard to follow. Needs serious copyediting or complete rewrite if it's to stay. - SoM 14:29, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Battle of Bailen Ungrammatical, author apparently not fluent in English. Capitalization.
March 29 2005
Abbot - could do with rearranging into titled sections — PhilHibbs | talk
Added a couple of sections, still needs a LOT of work Crazynas 18:46, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Abbess could be developed as well - and the two entries cross linked. Jackiespeel 15:34, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Googled the Thursday and two of their album label, only two hits, I don't think it's notable Crazynas 00:23, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Having criticised the notability aspect of many band articles, and been involved in the creation of many others, let me assure you that Thursday are certainly a noteable band by Wikipedia standards. The article is correct in holding them as one of the "largest bands in the underground scene." Narrative aside, we see that Google returns 21,100 hits for the search: thursday "war all the time", where 'war all the time' is Thursday's latest album. --Brendanfox 14:45, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I'm fairly new here, sounds fine with me Crazynas 19:02, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It bothers me when people claim things are non-notable just because they haven't heard of it. Thursday is a huge band with people who are into this sort of music. I mean, search "Thursday" on google, the band is the first two results. Out of 111 million + results for the word, I'd say they'd have to be pretty popular to achieve this. --Tothebarricades.tk 01:18, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I had no intention of implying they were not notable, i just didn't know. - cohesion☎ 06:27, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
Clearing House Interbank Payments System reads like an advertisement, but looks to be genuinely encyclopedic. I've wikified it to the best of my limited abilities, but it needs a lot more work. *Kat* 06:44, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
Joan I of Naples - dates and genealogy wrong; written like a romance novel; so bad that i cant look at it. muriel@pt 17:36, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Did some copy editting on it; it would benefit from more work. At least now I can follow the plot of what Joan is alleged to have done. -- llywrch 00:40, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
March 26 2005
Michael Schiavo is an article with current event relevance that needs quite a bit of NPOV work. Too much one-sidedness in the article so far. Alex.tan 00:37, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I wikified it and fixed some grammer, etc. Still needs major content work though. TheGWO 22:10, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
March 25 2005
I am horrified of the article for Combos it is just dreadful. I can't think of anything to add now. Help it out. Mcfly85 09:48, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It's a little better now. RussBlau 15:10, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I have wikified Samuel A. Ward but it reads like an essay. Should be edited. Andrew pmk 00:57, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I deleted most of the essay-like content and noted it on Talk:Samuel A. Ward. It didn't seem to contain any facts on Ward. Keithlaw 03:49, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
RNA world hypothesis needs help desperately by a biologist or chemist. Reads like a bad disjointed essay with lots of pov.--Deglr6328 07:42, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Somewhat better now; still needs work near the end. Timemutt 10:18, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Capleton - you're halfway down the article when you find out he's a reggae artist. Uses lots of weird terminology. RSpeer 05:15, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
Fixed some wikification in the discography (rm dead links) and added link to working main site of these links to seperate section. Mgm|(talk) 21:59, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Shouldn't this entire page be deleted? It's just an advertisement --Jackson
I wikified and edited the article a bit. Created a lot of internal links. --Redattack34
Mobile government is unwikified and reads like an essay not an article. Cedars 06:52, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page contains large chunks that are identical to [2], although it is not an exact copy. I suspect it was uploaded by one of the authors, who also runs a for-profit consultancy in this area [3]. Having said all that, it seems like there might be something worthy of keeping here, but not in its current form, and I don't know enough about the subject to write anything. RussBlau 15:00, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I edited it down, then merged it into eGovernment & re-directed. Bubamara 02:09, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I wikified it a lot. Someone may want to keep going; I left out a lot of internal links because they were broken. --Redattack34
March 22 2005
Calvinist Church, USA, reads like a copyvio, also completely unwikified. Needs to sound less like an ad.--nixie 06:44, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Bosnian crisis, text dump from a PD source about the start of WWI, I'm not sure it has the right name or that this informations isn't already covered elsewhere.--nixie 23:33, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Elections in Palau seems like it could be a decent article. I did a copyedit earlier, but it's mostly information that is found in Politics of Palau (which also needs some updating). -- Jwinters | Talk 22:22, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Primary immune deficiency seems to be a pretty important topic. Current article is copied wholesale from a website. Fairly straightforward case of cleanup, wikify, and reorganise as an encyclopedia article.--Fangz 00:15, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The Cold War main/overview entry needs some work on it, and to some extent the dependent articles (eg - where is any mention of the Long Telegram, which played a crucial part in development of American attitudes).
20 March 2005
The Long telegram needs to be more than a long quote: ie who context, issuer (any other historians top a century?) etc.
Feynman diagram - Writing is poor and unclear, particularly in the "Mathematical details" section. Someone who understands what it's trying to say should fix it. RSpeer 05:14, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
San Roque Parish cathedral needs clean up. It looks like original research, but the topic itself probably deserves an article. DaveTheRed 01:07, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
14 March 2005
Félix Varela needs to be cleaned up; it seems to be a translation from Spanish by someone with a less than fluent grasp of the English language. DO'Neil 09:16, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
I cleaned it up a bunch, but it still needs some attention from someone who knows about the topic. I didn't remove the cleanup box, not sure what merits its removal. Bonus Onus 00:13, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
Walter Halloran - original stub has large amounts of raw text dumped into it after his death a couple of days ago. Biographical info in there is certainly useful, but is probably copyvio now. Palnu 20:34, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
13 March 2005
River Oaks - This article isn't written very well. It sounds slightly POV and doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. Treborbassett 02:27, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Odious debt - I learned something from this article, but only by following the external link. From the two sentences in this article, I got no idea of what "odious debt" meant. The linked page has a clearer explanation, history of the term, and examples. RSpeer 01:28, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
Edited and expanded, but it's still basically a stub. RussBlau 15:02, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
11 March 2005
James Gorman - The bulk of the page is an HTML page dump from the Victoria Cross Reference. It currently contains a copyright notice, but the original author states that it is used with permission. At a guess that has scared people off from biting the bullet and reformating the text. On the other hand it looks like the associated images have been deleted, so perhaps there is a general copyright problem. -- Solipsist 13:48, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Reader-response_criticism could probably be reqritten into a quite rasonable article, but in its current form it defies many Wiki style guidelines. And the only current links from it are red. Grutness|hello? 07:45, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Aditya Karikalan. No context. Poor spelling/grammar. Not Wikified. (BTW Google reveals this looks like a real legend, not a hoax. It probably needs someone who knows about this mythology to see to the article.) Miss Pippa 06:26, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Börger. This is probably a machine translation. Poor spelling. Needs wikifying JoJan 19:27, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Kabanjahe - I fixed it up a bit, but I don't know enough. 2 hours by what mode of transportation? In which direction? Is the roast pork truly famous? RSpeer 01:45, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
10 March 2005
Tri-State Tornado. I've made some edits for grammar/POV, but final section too technical for my liking. Martpol 17:36, 10 Mar 2005
9 March 2005
Miksa Fenyo. A long article which should be broken up into smaller parts and wikified in several aspects. Adam78 00:48, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Optical isomerism. Article contains two footnotes designated by astericks. Should be wikified to enhance readability. StuTheSheep 03:19, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
Footnotes have been wikified using the new convention style Rapier Shade 16:19, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
8 March 2005
John Sinclair basically includes stub articles for three different John Sinclairs, at least two of which deserve their own articles. BTfromLA 21:05, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Added "split" tag. --Edcolins 22:26, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. Problem now seems to have been solved. ~~
Deal Or No Deal needs rewriting. I can't understand how the game works from the description. RSpeer 22:00, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
Launched roller coaster needs work on tone, removal of exclamation marks when describing specific rides might be nice too. I'll probably log on and do it from work, but if anyone wants to I'd appreciate it. Pakaran 12:12, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Looks like the above is now OK. Charlie123 13:25, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Completed cleanup and fixed ride names yesterday, but couldn't do more in "Other Styles" section using the information in the original. Znode 22:31, 2005 Mar 8 (UTC)
Christian Arabs is a real mess. Needs a bit of work from someone with more knowledge of the subject. --Nick 05:28, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
Dibba is in broken english without capitalization. RSpeer 19:52, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
Fixed grammar/spelling and fleshed it out a bit but needs more attention. Rasa 01:24, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Did a little work on it. Still a stub Zardiw 01:49, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
6 March 2005
Newgrounds, information on a website and its creator, currently it is written in a very fanboy manner and had a million external links, needs a good editor to tidy it up--nixie 03:55, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Slight cleanup of the timeline section - I'll do some more work later. --GrafixWiki 20:02, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
Beirut Needs work, and organization for such an important city 500LL 18:39, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Fixed up spelling, and general flow of the article. I don't know much about the actual facts though... LordAmeth 12:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
NedFest is a mess and sounds more like an advertisement. Totti 21:43, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Cleaned up advertisement style writing and generally cleaned up. Still needs some work.--Rapier Shade 16:25, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Giuseppe Garibaldi Needs work in integrating the entire bottom section into the article, as well as better organization. --Comics 05:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I'll take responsibility for this one. --Smack (talk) 05:47, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Sonoluminescence Bottom section of article describing mechanism of sonoluminescence is Awful, as it nvokes pseudoscience and discredited theories. Page has been listed on peer review but no one did anything. --Deglr6328 19:29, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
2 March 2005
Jones polynomial - There are some missing image notices in the HOMFLY(PT) polynomial section; someone ought to replace them or remove them. bd_ 00:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Vega Strike. There's enough info there for a decent article, but there's a lot of superflous (empty) headings and the images are neither captioned or non-intrusive - they're all just added into the text. Desplesda
Added captions to pictures, restructured the headings into lists where required and wikified the bottom section. --Rapier Shade 17:14, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I did some copyediting, but the way it's written doesn't lend itself to section-making. Needs a complete rewrite to sound less high-school-reportish. - dcljr 07:26, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Streaming media: I cleaned up a POV rant and some paragraphs that were written like a bad high school essay, but there's still cleanup to be done. The sections need to be restructured, for one thing. RSpeer 15:35, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
23 February 2005
Quite a few of the links from the French administrative units page could be reworked: the communes and other low level ranks are probably too many to create separate blank entries at present, but larger entities could be dealt with (disambiguation pages, the place Die etc).
If Wikipedia were not so slow these days it would be possible to list out some of the entries which need dealing with.
